"First of all... Smack # 5 in the face. Second... ..."
"I'm sure he wouldn't have, but equally that's not a ..."
"Early this morning at around 4 AM, an object believe..."
"I saw these in a catalogue at work yesterday... very..."
"Is it possible that another reason for the increase ..."
"what's to get ? nice. and it is crazee thru red-bl..."
"S&M? Skulls and Monsters?..."
"Actually, why can't both things be true--that your c..."
"Thanks everyone! The Bootie site is alive and wel..."
"Sympathies all around but that doesn't tackle the qu..."
"#10 posted by noen:
This works f..."
"Where's the architect? I want to meet him and PUNCH ..."
"Is it improving or what? I'm not giving anyone the b..."
"Reminds me of Denis Leary's idotic rant about autism..."
""What happened to the nuts?" The NUTRAGEOUSness wen..."
"Fortunately, his blithe assumption that genes are th..."
"@Rob "Global Warming strikes me as the Rapture for ..."
"Allergies can be brought on by environment as well. ..."
"Kimchi! No, wait......"
"I don't think it's a yuppie invention per se (cloist..."
the latest
latest episodes
The formatting is broken in the original blog post, but my favourite is definitely the rendition that removes the figure altogether and shows only the setting. Makes you doubly aware of the fame and familiarity of that face and smile (and personally, what a relief sometimes it is not to see it for the hundredth time).
I like the one where she's reclining on the bench, sort of Pre-Raphaelity; someone's taken the time to imagine her as a real person that did more than pose for a single portrait. The ones where she's exposing her breasts or butt are kind of annoying; it's the sort of thing that I would have done when I was about twelve years old.